![]() The attorneys at Brown, Bradshaw & Moffat, LLP, understand the importance of the rules of criminal procedure in Utah and how those rules might apply to your case. What happens when the prosecutor makes vague accusations against a person accused of a crime in the charging document? In those cases, the criminal defense attorney should carefully draft and file a motion for a bill of particulars prior to arraignment to explain why more particularity is needed. Attorney for a Bill of Particulars in Salt Lake City, UT In many Utah criminal cases, the bill of particulars is needed to both assist the vourt in determining whether evidence that the state intends to introduce at trial is admissible, and to enable the defendant to adequately prepare his or her defense to the charges in the information or the amended information. RAMOS Purok 6, Bliss Village, Ilagan, Isabela.A criminal defense attorney in Utah can file a motion for bill of particulars to ask the court, pursuant to Rule 4(e) of the Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure, to enter an order directing the state to provide a bill of particulars in this case. SALVADOR Respondent/Movant Respondent/Movant THE CLERK OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY OMBUDSMAN FOR LUZON Greetings! Please take notice that the foregoing motion shall be submitted for the kind consideration of the Honorable Office without any further argument thereof. MARAMAG Respondent/Movant Respondent/Movant FERNANDO S. Other reliefs just and equitable under the premises are likewise prayed for.Ilagan, Isabela ApCECILIO JACINTO ARNOLD C. WHEREFORE, premises considered, it is respectfully prayed of the Honorable Office to issue an order granting this Motion for a Bill of Particulars for both OMB-L-C-10-0020-A and OMB-L-A-10-0030-A and the complainant to make a Compliance therewith. 5.That as provided under Rule 12 of the Rules of Court, respondents hereby moves for a Bill of Particulars or for a more definite statement of the charges against them so that they may be able to properly prepare a responsive pleading. ![]() Likewise, the respondents do not know what specific act of Falsification under the Revised Penal Code is being charged against them. In the same vein, the affidavit-complaint does not indicate what particular provision of Republic Act 6713 is violated. That the affidavit-complaint failed to indicate what particular prohibited act under Republic Act 3019 has been violated. That as provided in the affidavit-complaints in both OMB-L-C-10-0020-A and OMB-L-A-10-0030-A, the charge of the complainant is that the respondents committed a violation of Republic Act 3019, a violation of Republic Act 6713 and the crime of Falsification under the Revised Penal Code.Such complaints are not definite and that the respondents are not being properly informed of the charges against them. ![]() 2.That the respondents have been preparing their respective counter-affidavits, but are having difficulty in squarely answering the charges against them as the affidavit-complaint suffers from insufficient definiteness, which necessities this motion for bill of particulars. SALVADOR in OMB-L-C-10-0020-A, and CECILIO JACINTO in OMB-L-A-10-0030-A, respectively, received a copy of the Orders issued by this Honorable Office on April 31, 2010, ordering them to submit their respective Counter-affidavits in answer to the attached Affidavit-complaints and supporting documents. ![]() No 6713 CECILIO JACINTO, Respondent, -x JOINT MOTION FOR BILL OF PARTICULARS Respondent/s, unto this Honorable Office most respectfully states: 1. ![]() Get Your Custom Essay on "Bill of Particulars Example." ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |